Vibe coding agency — AI builds fast, we make it production-ready.
We are a vibe coding agency that uses Cursor, Claude Code, and Replit Agent to build real apps — then adds human architecture, design, and QA testing. You get AI speed with the reliability of an experienced development team. MVPs ship in 2–6 weeks.
Last updated:
Trusted by clients on
Apps we already shipped with AI
Same process, applied to your project. Tap a card for the full story.
What is a vibe coding agency?
A vibe coding agency is a development team that uses AI coding tools — Cursor, Claude Code, Replit Agent, Bolt — as primary delivery tools, not occasional helpers. You hand over a project; the AI generates 80–95% of the code in days; the agency architects, designs, QAs, and ships the 5–20% that AI gets wrong. The result: production-grade apps 30–50% faster and cheaper than traditional development, with the safety net of a real team instead of a solo freelancer running prompts. Teamz Lab is a UK-based vibe coding agency with shipped apps on Google Play and App Store — DeviceGPT and No Trace Chat — and a verified Upwork history as proof.
Why hire a vibe coding agency instead of doing it yourself?
AI tools like Cursor and Claude Code can generate 80–95% of your app code in days. The remaining 5–20% — security, edge cases, architecture, performance, and polish — is where AI-generated apps break in production. A vibe coding agency like Teamz Lab closes that gap. We use the same AI tools, but we add professional architecture review, UX/UI design in Figma, comprehensive QA testing, and deployment expertise. The result: you get AI speed without the AI quality risks.
Our vibe coding tool stack
We work with every major AI development tool: Cursor (agent-first, multi-workspace), Claude Code (terminal-native, codebase-aware), Replit Agent (rapid prototyping, parallel tasks), and GitHub Copilot. Our architects choose the right tool for each project — and switch to traditional development for the parts where AI is not the best fit. No dogma, just results.
What we build as a vibe coding agency
Mobile apps (Flutter, Android, iOS), SaaS web apps, admin dashboards, AI-powered products, ecommerce stores, and MVPs for startups. We have shipped real apps to Google Play and App Store using AI-accelerated development — DeviceGPT and No Trace Chat are live proof. Same process, applied to your project.
Vibe coding for non-technical founders
You do not need to be technical. Tell us your idea, we handle everything: scoping, design in Figma, AI-accelerated development, testing, deployment, and app store submission. You get regular updates and a clickable prototype before we write production code. Most founder MVPs ship in 3–5 weeks.
Cursor development agency
Cursor 3 introduced agent-first workflows, multi-workspace support, and parallel agent tasks — making it the most powerful AI coding tool available in 2026. As a Cursor development agency, we use these capabilities daily to ship apps faster. Our developers know when to let Cursor agents run and when to intervene — the judgment that separates a working demo from a production app.
Claude Code development service
Claude Code works directly in your terminal and understands your entire codebase context. We use it for complex refactoring, test generation, code review, and rapid feature development. As a Claude Code development service, we combine Anthropic's agentic coding with our architecture and design expertise — especially strong for backend-heavy and API-driven projects.
Vibe coding consultants — strategy, audit, hiring help
Not every team needs a full vibe coding agency. Some founders just need vibe coding consultants for 2–4 weeks: pick the right AI tool stack (Cursor vs Claude Code vs Replit Agent vs Bolt), audit a half-built AI codebase, write the architecture spec your team will hand to engineers, or sit in on hiring calls when you screen vibe coders. We do consult-only engagements from $1,500/week, no minimum commitment, billed weekly through Upwork escrow. Most consultancy engagements convert into delivery work — but they do not have to.
Vibe coding as a service (VCaaS) — monthly retainer
For teams shipping a roadmap of features instead of one MVP, we offer vibe coding as a service: a fixed monthly retainer ($1,500–$6,000/mo) with a senior engineer + designer + PM running Cursor / Claude Code / Replit Agent against your backlog every week. Stand-ups, weekly demos, full Linear/Jira visibility. Pause or cancel any month. This is the model most growing SaaS founders pick after the first MVP ships.
Vibe coding team — embedded squad model
When the project is big enough to need a vibe coding team (3+ people running AI tools in parallel), we embed a senior engineer, mid engineer, designer, and PM as a single squad. Daily stand-ups in your Slack, your tools, your repo. The squad uses Cursor multi-workspace and Claude Code sub-agents to ship features in days instead of weeks. Available from 4 weeks minimum, all UK / EU time-zone overlap.
Why pick a vibe coding digital agency vs a freelance vibe coder
A solo freelance vibe coder can ship a clickable demo in a weekend — that is the whole appeal. The risk: no architect, no QA, no designer, no second pair of eyes. Vibe coding digital agencies like Teamz Lab give you the same AI tooling plus the surrounding craft: design system, security review, deploy pipeline, App Store / Play Store submission, and a written hand-off doc. Same speed when the work is straightforward, much lower blast radius when something breaks at 2 AM.
Vibe web development agencies — when AI fits the web stack
For web apps and marketing sites specifically, vibe web development agencies pair Cursor + Claude Code with Next.js, Astro, Tailwind, and shadcn/ui — the stacks where AI tools have the most training data and produce the cleanest output. We have shipped Astro marketing sites, Next.js SaaS dashboards, and Shopify Hydrogen storefronts using this workflow. AI is strongest on the web; mobile (Flutter, native iOS/Android) needs more human input.
Vibe coding agency — hiring checklist for 2026
Searching "vibe coding agency" returns a mix of freelancers running overnight prompts and traditional agencies that added "AI" to their homepage last month. Here is what to check before you pay anyone. First: ask for live apps on the store — not a Figma prototype, not a demo URL, but a real app you can download and break in five minutes. Teamz Lab has DeviceGPT and No Trace Chat on both Google Play and App Store right now. Second: ask who specifically reviewed the architecture and security of the AI-generated code. A vibe coding agency without a senior engineer signing off on every PR is just a sophisticated prompt runner — and prompt-generated code has real security gaps. Third: insist on payment through escrow. Every Teamz Lab engagement runs through Upwork with milestone-based payment: you approve each deliverable before funds move. If an agency asks for a bank transfer before you see working software, that is a red flag regardless of their portfolio.
What the first two weeks with our vibe coding agency actually look like
Most vibe coding agency pages skip this because most vibe coding agencies do not have a repeatable Week 1. Ours does. Day 1: a free 45-minute scoping call — we ask about the problem, the users, the launch date, and the budget. You leave with a written one-page scope and a fixed price. Day 2–3: the Upwork contract is created with milestone-based payment; you fund milestone one before we touch the code. Day 4–7: architecture doc + Figma wireframes + a clickable prototype in Figma or Bolt. You approve before we open Cursor. Week 2: production build in Cursor / Claude Code with daily 2-minute Loom updates and a shared Linear board. End of Week 2: staging build on TestFlight or Play internal testing — real device, not a screenshot. If any of that slips, the milestone does not release. Most founders sign the contract on Day 3–5 after the first call. Nothing about the process is a surprise, which is the point.
You searched "vibe coding agency" — here is which of our pages you actually want
Teamz Lab keeps two vibe-coding pages, because the work splits into two genuinely different jobs and one page cannot honestly serve both. This page — /vibe-coding-agency/ — is the right one if you want a team to deliver a working app end-to-end: scope, design, build in Cursor / Claude Code / Replit Agent, QA, and ship to App Store or Play. It also covers the advisory work we used to split onto a separate page: tool-stack selection, a codebase audit of what AI already wrote, architecture specs, and hiring help, with or without us writing the production code afterwards. If your current app was generated by AI and is broken, insecure, or unshippable, /vibe-coding-repair/ is the right entry point — that is a rescue job, not a build. Both are owned by the same UK team (Teamz Lab LTD, Companies House 16106867), both run through Upwork escrow, and both are backed by the same live-on-both-stores proof: DeviceGPT and No Trace Chat.
Vibe coding agency vs traditional dev agency — same deliverable, different math
A traditional dev agency and a vibe coding agency ship the same thing: a working app that survives real users. The difference is how the hours get spent. A traditional agency budgets roughly 60% of hours writing code that AI can now generate in minutes — CRUD endpoints, form validation, list screens, boilerplate tests, ORM plumbing. A vibe coding agency lets Cursor, Claude Code, and Replit Agent do that work in a fraction of the time, then reinvests the freed hours into the parts AI still misses: data-model decisions, auth and payments edge cases, race conditions in real-time features, App Store review compliance, and the design polish that decides whether users stay past Day 1. Concretely, a four-week traditional MVP is typically a two-to-three-week vibe coding MVP at a 30–50% lower total price, because the head-count-hour bill is smaller — not because the quality bar dropped. Where a traditional agency still wins: multi-year platform engagements with deep proprietary domain code (fintech core banking, ad-serving, embedded / firmware), and any project where AI training data is thin. A vibe coding agency wins for MVPs, feature ships on established stacks (Flutter, Next.js, Astro, Shopify), and roadmap sprints where the same team ships weekly against a backlog. If your project is on a stack AI has seen a million times, vibe coding is the honest recommendation. If it is not, we will tell you and shape the engagement accordingly.
Vibe coding agency — what happens after the MVP ships
Most vibe coding agency pages sell the build and go quiet on the month after launch, which is when most AI-generated apps quietly rot. Ours does not. Every project ships with a one-month post-launch support window included in the price — bug fixes, crash triage from Crashlytics / Sentry, App Store review reply drafting, and a weekly 30-minute call while your first users hit real edge cases. If a change is genuinely out of scope we say so, but pretty much everything discovered in the first 30 days is on us. After that window you have three honest options and we say the same thing to every founder: (1) end the engagement with a written hand-off doc, the repo, and a runbook — your team takes it from here, no lock-in; (2) hourly ad-hoc from $75/hour on Upwork, paid milestone-per-fix, for founders whose apps run themselves and only need occasional touch-ups; or (3) move to the monthly VCaaS retainer above, which is what most SaaS founders pick once the roadmap has more than "fix this bug" on it. The bug-fix ledger from Week 5 onward is public inside Linear so you can see exactly what got done for the retainer — no invoice mystery.
Cursor vs Claude Code vs Replit Agent — when to use which
| Capability | Cursor 3 | Claude Code | Replit Agent |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best for | Full-stack app dev | Refactor + backend | Rapid prototype |
| Runs in | Native editor | Terminal | Browser workspace |
| Whole-codebase context | Yes (indexed) | Yes (agentic) | Partial |
| Parallel agent tasks | Yes (multi-workspace) | Yes (sub-agents) | Yes |
| Human review needed | High (UI/arch) | Medium (tests) | High (security) |
| Teamz Lab uses it for | Feature work, UI flows | Backend, tests, audits | MVP zero-to-one |
Our developer shortlist. We pick per task, not per trend.
What clients say
-
“I worked with them on Upwork. It was about solving a huge problem in my e-comm mobile app. They did a great job by not only solving it but also updating the codebase. I loved it. I highly recommend.”
Reza Babu , CEO, Buynow (Germany) — via Trustpilot
-
“I found this company full of energy and packed with passionate developers who served with the highest quality of product, which I exactly wanted. Crafted the solution like their own product. Once will love the collaboration with them.”
Ariful Islam — via Trustpilot
-
“Professional Developers, Excellent experience! Thanks for completing the project in time”
Raha — via Trustpilot
Pricing
We offer flexible packages — all through Upwork with payment protection. One-off design tasks from $35/screen (app screens, logos, landing pages — no monthly commitment). Monthly design from $750/month. App development from $1500/month. Full-service (research + design + dev + QA) from $3000/month.
FAQ
Frequently asked questions
- What is a vibe coding agency?
- A vibe coding agency uses AI development tools (Cursor, Claude Code, Replit Agent) to build apps faster than traditional development — while adding human architecture, design, and QA testing to ensure production quality. You get AI speed with professional reliability.
- What happens after a vibe coding agency ships my MVP — do I have to keep paying you?
- No. Every Teamz Lab build ships with a one-month post-launch support window included in the price — bug fixes, crash triage, and a weekly 30-minute call while your first real users hit edge cases. After that you pick: (1) end the engagement with a written hand-off, the repo, and a runbook — no lock-in, your team takes it; (2) hourly ad-hoc from $75/hour on Upwork, paid per fix; or (3) the monthly VCaaS retainer (from $1,500/mo) with a senior + designer + PM against your backlog. Most SaaS founders pick option 3 once the roadmap grows past "fix this bug"; solo consumer apps often pick option 1 or 2. We say the same thing to every founder regardless of which page you land on.
- What is the difference between a vibe coding agency, vibe coding consultants, and vibe coding as a service?
- Vibe coding agency = full project delivery, scoped MVP or feature, fixed scope. Vibe coding consultants = 2–4 week advisory engagement (tool stack, architecture, audit, hiring help) without writing production code. Vibe coding as a service (VCaaS) = monthly retainer with embedded senior + designer + PM running AI tools against your backlog. Most clients start with consultants, move to agency for an MVP, then switch to VCaaS once the product ships.
- Do you work as a vibe coding team or a single vibe coder?
- Both. For audits or 1–2 week jobs, a single senior vibe coder is enough. For MVPs and ongoing roadmap work, we embed a vibe coding team — senior engineer, mid engineer, designer, PM — running Cursor multi-workspace and Claude Code sub-agents in parallel. Squad model is a 4-week minimum.
- Are you a vibe web development agency or a mobile vibe coding agency?
- Both. AI tools are strongest on web (Next.js, Astro, Shopify Hydrogen, Tailwind) where training data is densest. Mobile (Flutter, native iOS/Android) still needs more human input — but our team has shipped both. DeviceGPT (Android) and No Trace Chat (iOS + Android) are our live mobile examples; Teamz Lab company site itself is the web example.
- Is vibe coding safe for production apps?
- Not without human oversight. Raw AI-generated code has security gaps, untested edge cases, and architectural issues. That is exactly what a vibe coding agency fixes. We review, test, and harden everything AI generates before it goes live.
- How much does a vibe coding agency cost?
- Monthly packages start from $1,500 for development and $750 for design. One-off design tasks from $35/screen. Most startup MVPs cost $3,000–$15,000 total. All through Upwork with payment protection — you pay only when you approve. Because AI accelerates the coding, total project costs are typically 30–50% lower than traditional agency development for the same scope.
- How fast can you ship an MVP?
- Most MVPs ship in 2–6 weeks. Simple apps can be faster. Complex apps with AI features, payments, and multiple user roles take longer. We give you a realistic timeline after a free scoping call.
- Do I own the source code?
- Yes. You own 100% of the source code, designs, and assets we create. No lock-in, no licensing fees. Your code, your product.
- What is the difference between Cursor and Claude Code?
- Cursor is an AI-native code editor with agent-first workflows — best for full-stack app development. Claude Code is a terminal-based coding agent that understands entire codebases — best for refactoring, complex backend work, and test generation. We use both depending on the task.
- Can you fix my AI-generated app?
- Yes. Vibe coding repair is one of our most common services. We audit your AI-generated code, fix security and architecture issues, add proper design, and make it production-ready. See our dedicated vibe coding repair page.
- How do I find a reputable vibe coding agency?
- Three checks. First, ask for apps currently live on Google Play or App Store — real production apps users are running today, not demos. Second, confirm a named senior engineer owns the architecture: AI writes code fast, but the judgment calls on security, data models, and edge cases still need a human. Third, pay through escrow (Upwork is our platform) so your money only moves when you approve working software. Teamz Lab passes all three: DeviceGPT and No Trace Chat are live on both stores, every project has a senior engineer owner, and every contract runs through Upwork payment protection.
- How long from first message to a signed contract with your vibe coding agency?
- Usually three to five business days. The path: you message us on Upwork with a rough brief, we reply within a working day with 3–5 clarifying questions, we book a 45-minute scoping call, and within 24 hours of that call you get a written one-page scope, a fixed price, and a milestone breakdown. If you accept, the Upwork contract is live the same day. There is no MSA, no NDA gauntlet, no procurement dance for standard MVP work. First milestone funds sit in Upwork escrow the moment you approve — we start work the same day funds land. The only thing that slows this down is unclear scope, which the scoping call exists to fix.
- Is Teamz Lab a vibe coding agency, and how is it different from your other AI-development pages?
- Yes — Teamz Lab is a vibe coding agency that delivers finished apps end to end using Cursor, Claude Code, and Replit Agent, with senior engineers signing off on every PR. This page (/vibe-coding-agency/) is the entry point for building: scope, design, build, QA and ship, and equally for the advisory version of that work — tool-stack selection, an audit of code AI already wrote, architecture specs, or hiring help. We keep one sister page live, /vibe-coding-repair/, because rescuing a broken AI-generated app is a different job from building one: the code already exists, and the work is diagnosis before delivery. Same UK team (Teamz Lab LTD, Companies House 16106867), same Upwork escrow, same live-on-both-stores proof — DeviceGPT and No Trace Chat — whichever you land on.
- Is a vibe coding agency the same as a traditional dev agency that added AI tools to its stack?
- No — and this is the most common confusion when hiring one. A traditional agency that adopted AI still plans, staffs, and prices the project like a 2022 engagement: sprint two, sprint three, four devs on each sprint, AI used sporadically to autocomplete a function. A vibe coding agency plans the whole project assuming Cursor / Claude Code / Replit Agent is the primary code author from day one — smaller team, shorter timeline, tighter human review process specifically tuned for AI-generated code (chunk sizes, PR sizes, and where a senior engineer must sign off). Same senior engineers, same design and QA rigour, same store-submission craft — different economics and a shorter path to a shipped app. The test to tell them apart on a sales call: ask how many hours the AI tools save on a typical MVP, and how the agency reinvests those hours. A traditional agency using AI cannot answer that precisely because their process was not built around it.
Ready to start?
Hire us through Upwork — your payment is protected by escrow. You pay only when you approve the work. Check our portfolio and reviews first.